Blockchain has reached the peak of its capabilities. With every fresh project appearing te this area it becomes evident that there is no way for further revolutionary blockchain development, except ter puny improvements and workarounds from the original Bitcoin blockchain. The scheme ingenious te its plainness, due to this plainness is utterly rigid. There is a growing need for a fresh paradigm that while retaining the base features of blockchain will permit for more elaborate interactions and more limber structure on a global scale.
The Monolithic nature of blockchain that makes immutability possible at the same time renders scalability unlikely. There are workarounds, but they are neither inherent strafgevangenis reliable.
Wij need to go further with caveats that give birth to a fresh scheme altogether, but with blockchain ter mind. The History of blockchain development clearly shows that while it wasgoed an stijlvol and efficient scheme at very first, with more and more added functionalities it became bloated and maze-like. There is no viable decentralized solution to terugwedstrijd to plainness except by providing a fresh scheme with more degrees of freedom.
I am te process of introducing a revolutionary switch ter cryptocurrency. It will be a fresh coin, but no longer under the conventional blockchain protocol, instead a multi-dimensional lattice structure, known spil Bitlattice.
Bitlattice is a fresh paradigm and fundamentally different from Bitcoin and the major alt-coin protocols. It is something very novel and experimental. Bitlattice mitigates many common issues te the classic blockchain including scalability, timing, complexity, and the inability to have independent oracles.
Blockchain spil a technology is already fairly old. The majority of the underlying protocol on the Bitcoin blockchain is reasonable. However, there are some points that hamper broad and anxious adoption of it. For example, well-known scalability issues stemming from the flatness of the chain (and few other factors spil well). Time stamping problems stemming from the distributed peer-to-peer architecture that actually wasn’t designed for this purpose (while there are many different implementations of p2p protocols te general, they differ with only a handful of schemes).
There are also higher level issues, like which proof to pick, what prioritization to set, how miners are placed inwards a network and many more. All of them have certain benefits and drawbacks.
My project differs substantially from traditional projects because it is not a blockchain. While it still provides the same fundamental benefits, lattice architecture is totally different thus providing extra benefits and solving several inherent blockchain issues.
It’s lattice retaining some chain’s properties. Actually, at the present stage of research it’s a five-dimensional lattice interconnected with forms, and can be portrayed with directed graphs. It can be collapsed to one-dimensional chain which provides the same immutability the current blockchain provides. But at the same time it provides means for features like lattice encryption.
There is one extra funny side-effect of the structure I have ter mind. Such network could potentially act spil a neural network and be able to self-organize to a certain extent.
My friend, neurobiologist, compared my idea exactly to a Neural Network. And there is some truth te this comparison. Up to the point that one of the features te my idea acts exactly spil synapses and I also postulate homomorphically encrypted seeded entities acting spil local authorities and being “hidden variables” of this network, something that can be compared to a primitive consciousness.
Such an treatment, with technical details will describe when I’m sure that everything works spil expected on a prototype level.
Everyone can join now provided that they overeenkomstig to my foundational Bitlattice idea – this is to prevent mess and encourage a cohesive team with preset goals. Wij are looking for visionaries like us, people who are open-minded and courageous enough to thump conservatism and bring the lattice protocol to the mainstream cryptocurrency world.
Hibryda [published 15 02.2018]
Wij invite you to go after our thread on bitcointalk
* Wij are at the research &, developmental stage of the project and will notify you personally through email when updates on the 2nd and third generation updates are implemented.
*free guide available on bitcoinwoman.com
Universal skill matters te a rapidly switching world, skill not abilities. Abilities depend on presently used devices and technologies while skill is universal.
The purpose is to provide a fresh perspective on learning process and ample chance for beginners who can get some practical guidance from our ‘skill matters’ series and build up universal skill together with us.
creator of Bitlattice
Inventor, independent security researcher. Since inception of blockchain’s technology, developer and early adopter ter this area.
I overeenkomst with security issues since some 20 years. I know both physical architecture related ones spil well spil those that stem from logical limitations.
After 25 years of programming (commenced on 386 DX2 66Mhz with 2MB of RAM 🙂 ) I can code ter anything code-able.
founder and main investor to Bitlattice
Multi disciplinary artists, creative graphic designers and programmers,
enthusiasts of inventions and stunning artworks, passionates about the latest researches ter areas of robotics, security systems and Human-Robots Transcultural Interaction.
Authors of “Skill Matters – gaining universal skill”
investor and active supporter of the project
investor and active supporter of the project
investor and active supporter of the project
IT professional and sultry technologist.
Work hard. Have joy. Make history.
active supporter of the project
Business holder/technicus across Australasian regions.
Crypto veteran supporting step shift switch te civilization.
Chief Marketing Officer (CMO)
Avid supporter of the Bitlattice project,
with a background ter marketing, commercial law, and business strategy.
Sultry about fresh technologies
that aim to inspire positive switch te the world.
To boldly go where no man – or woman
– has gone before.
Wayford is our Chief Marketing Officer (CMO). From now on Wayford will be te charge of Co-ordination for Bitlattice Marketing Team. He will voeling everyone who has stated that want to support our project this way. Anyone interested ter assisting with the marketing please don’t hesitate and voeling him directly to [email protected]
Before wij go to public wij want to hire a public relation(marketing) person who will build up a thorough understanding of advanced concepts of bitlattice and vormgeving a campaign to reach the targeted audience (communicate with the media and general public).
That could be you. Before you write to [email protected] you might want to dual check our requirements.
- Wij value:
- – passion and imagination,
- – skill ter different areas,
- – critical thinking,
- – persuasive communication,
- – the capability to understand the public,
- – technical and organizational abilities,
- – practice te marketing te the cryptocurrency/blockchain field.
Wij are looking for someone who can investigate, learn and pay attention to detail, who is creative, professional, organized and autonomous.
Searching for such universal person might seem like hoping for a miracle. Actually if wij are going to succeed wij are going to need hundreds of such miracles:)
Spread the word!
The development goes spil expected. Most of crucial components are operational, still lots of work to do. The launch of network will take place after Fresh Year. Not sure about the precies date. The shift is actually due to BTC market turmoil that can effectively stoom any fresh coin appearance. Besides, some extra time will give us chance to add features and test all scrupulously.
Cryptocoins depend on many concepts that should be understood before going deeper. Unluckily, to understand it decently there is no shortcut. Spil to Bitlattice – a catch is that it’s not a blockchain. There are common points, but mostly treatment differs. So, base skill about computing issues can help a lotsbestemming.
Our free guide ‘skill matters’ is already available on bitcoinwoman.com
Work is ter progress te several areas. Very first of all basic tx operations using different vectors of operation have bot originally tested. They still need to be refined te terms of reliability. Meantime works on a network protocol are before test phase. BL will use custom-made toroid based network protocol making use of resolving tensors with machine learning algorithm. While there are similar solutions ter the wild wij choose to have custom-built made one due to specific needs of BL. To perform live tests wij build now a server equipment capable of simulating managed network environment (32 cores for VMs, VMs running numerous plain end knots, lots of netwerken hardware and cables :)).
There will be testnet. Cannot however say now precisely when. If Bitlattice would be a fork of some blockchain based solution there will be little punt with providing testnet prompt. However, BL isn’t blockchain at all, it has similar properties, but is different at a base level. Thus, the client voorwaarde be written almost from scrape. It have to take some time to truss all the features into one concise chunk of code. So, be patient, it will come.
Funds for further research for this year are already secured.
Wij’ve updated our webstek to be more ter line with 3D:). Furthermore, wij’ll add talk and/or forum ter some not too distant future.
Wij invite you to go after our thread on bitcointalk
Fresh logo and webstek are ready.
This article ‘A Philosophical Note on the Existential Risks of Absolutism ter the Pro-Fork / Anti-Fork Debate’ drove mij into some philosophical considerations that I usually choose to evade. Spil this lump is a good read I would like to augment it with my thoughts no matter how shallow they are.
Whenever I read about any absolute principal values I see this pagina 362 from Principia Rekenkunde followed by a sarcastic laughter of Tarski and far less audible one of Gödel (spil dying of thirst is a resource consuming process). Then I hear Russel mumbling about how stijlvol it wasgoed supposed to be and how violent the reality is. Eventually Turing joins the argument speaking something of a monstrous halting kwestie to be better poisoned with gas (presumably hydrogen cyanide given his final predilection).
side note: actually attempting to figure out Principia’s inference rules shaped my scant style of writing, I permanently attempt to keep my texts maximally consistent, with little effect, I know. No, never read this from voorkant to voorkant 🙂
Wij can securely exclude math and logic from a list of candidates for being absolute principal values, spil while it seems to suggest absolute certainty, exceptions are written te fine print spil annotations. And sadly, there is no way to fix it.
Surely then at least our material world voorwaarde suggest stable foundations… I can picture only one — absolute boredom of being a photon. Nothing happens. No time passes. Nothing moves. Gosh.
Despite this special case nothing can be certain (actually even this special case), not to mention absolute. All would be fine if PETA existed early enough to keep this perverted Schrödinger away from felines. Raunchy luck, this poor cat will bounce inbetween right. being dead and alive unless observed. Spil everything. Funny how acceptable it became to people. Most likely because they think that this only happens somewhere down there, among particles. And levitating superconductors on science fairs are magic…
Let it all be stochastic, people say, but on macro scale wij can at least measure everything and tackle all thesis strange quantum side effects. Provided wij can measure anything with absolute precision. And of course wij cannot — whole SI measures system suffers from lack of precision (with most vooraanstaand example of mass units). Again absolute miss.
OK, but our measures are good enough to send space probes zillions of miles from our planet and they klapper the spot, right? Actually only because they have error correction algorithms applied, spil a ordinary problem of calculating trajectories of three or more celestial figures is unlikely to solve with absolute certainty. And it’s not because errors te our measures accumulate (despite they do), but because this problem isn’t lightly solvable. Actually there are some special cases solutions, but te mostly error correction to mitigate perturbations is the only effective measure, at least ter our universe. Speaking of the universe, even this entity cannot be considered absolute. There can be other universes. Besides wij cannot prove even existence of the one wij very likely are ter. The brain te the vat concept is pretty attractive, spil it would mean that I write for myself and my audience will behave exactly spil I’ll force it to. Because there is no audience. You are all my imagination.
Or maybe not? Maybe wij live te a simulation? Very hyped theory now, actually with roots ter Antiquity. Shame that Plato cannot overeenkomst with Musk, even if the latter used rather unrefined arguments. So, wij all take part te a spel. Not sure why picked this precies hub to play te, maybe because I desired to face a hard difficulty level where stupidity is predominant. Will have plus twenty to stupidity evasion skill when I finish it. Whoever wrote this mod should be praised for vormgeving. Bots and sceneries are convincingly real.
Of course, if it’s simulation there is nothing absolute here, no eternal principles, maybe somewhere ter real world…
I could iterate my search for objective absolute principles overheen many more areas, but I suppose that the only discovery would be a word count limit of Medium.
Humans and absolute principles
The above lengthy introduction serves two purposes. Very first, it shows how hard is to tell anything truly precise about our reality, not to mention objective principles of absolute influence on it. 2nd, which derives from the very first, is the conclusion that any and all absolute values are products of our brains.
Wij, humans, are products of evolution (disregard simulacra and brain te the vat for a ogenblik). While purposeless, this process exhibits a feature that makes it self sustainable — the self preservation instinct. One of adaptations serving this instinct is our intelligence. Wij, spil well spil most animals, developed sophisticated biological computers able to process abstract representations of reality. While plain animals can only match some shapes and patterns, wij, together with primates and some other ingewikkeld animals, are able to process very ingewikkeld schemes. What differentiates us from our cousins is that wij are the only species that can describe thesis schemes and even transfer into outward records or pass them to children.
Wij call thesis schemes “ideas”. When one sees a chair, an idea of a chair is compared with perception signals coming from senses. Then the brain determines whether the signal matches or not with what is defined by the idea. For our safety (to sate the self preservation instinct) it’s better if wij sit on a chair instead of an alligator or a camp fire.
Just because why not wij also craft ideas that have no material omschrijving. Like maker, democracy, good, bad, justice. While most people more or less know what thesis words mean, they have no rigorous definitions — they always depend on subjective perception of individuals and some very faint logical scaffoldings (thanks Hume). They serve numerous purposes mostly regarding our social relations. Spil thesis relations, due to biological reasons, are significant to us, wij tend to ascribe thesis terms an “absolute” property. Of course without any logical reason behind. Because why not. Because this way they sound more serious.
Humans are made to get through, not to be fair. The strategy of tricks and lies, wij use so often, is a part of of the above mentioned self preservation instinct that makes our survival chances higher. On the other arm, wij don’t like others using excessively this strategy spil it disorganizes our fragile social relations. Te search of a golden rule wij enforced laws and law enforcement. But thesis are makeshift measures never addressing the real punt.
When blockchain appeared it looked like it has a property expected since millenias — no trust needed thanks to immutability that ensures that no human can fraudulently alter the ledger. It quickly became overduidelijk that even with support of this purported property humans remain susceptible to be scammed and fooled. Nothing indeed switched. The world of cryptocurrency is not less dirty then the material one. The only difference is that one doesn’t have to meet a scammer te person to be screwed.
What’s more significant the immutability property is a myth. A single entity with enough power and money could mutate any blockchain. It’s just not profitable enough. Every peer to peer network can be supervised and manipulated. Encryption helps only a little (but helps). A community of any size can do the same with hard fork if enough support is amassed. Te Ethereum case this manipulation seems to be fair spil it will be an effect of common overeenstemming. With all side effects that can toebijten.
One striking thing that appeared during the process of reaching overeenstemming is that te fact a hard fork is far more fair than the a soft one. Contrary to its name and popular perception soft fork is not about forking vanaf se, but about censorship of the network. The chain remains intact, while clients control the flow of information. To exert a soft fork of any kleintje a majority of miners vereiste go after. Miners voorwaarde be incentivised somehow for this act which te turn generates uneven and thus degenerate situation of the community being dependent on miners. Situation that te fact hampers popular adoption and application of blockchain technology spil a entire.
Contrarily a hard fork is more independent of miners (not totally, but they are placed te a keurig perspective te this case, they are the network servants instead of managers). Competence to execute a fork belongs to the community. What’s crucial — any part of it, not fifty one procent. I could kwestie a client application implementing a hard fork even tomorrow. If I could find enough volgers, my chain would become predominant with time. Frankly, it looks like truly community’s rule measure. At least far more straight forward and fair than the soft fork censorship.
The above shows how subjective and unimportant the immutability is. It serves a purpose to keep the ledger consistent and it’s its only use te fact. Spil absolute values are born te our minds the “absolute”, “inviolable”, “principal” or whatever adjective can be added to it at will, however with neither real meaning strafgevangenis influence.
No matter how much we’d like to run away from trust issues they’ll pursue us and kick our arses. Unless wij become friends. The community governance based on trust is exactly what should be discussed now, instead of never ending and fruitless bragging about absolute principles. There are reputation systems ter development, there are existing ones that could be investigated. This is what would make this business sane. Instead of yelling again “Vitalik saved us” and waiting for a miracle the community could project and execute steps with total conscience assured by trusted entities. Trusted thanks repetitive testing and assessment of deeds. Entities with exactly defined responsibilities and profits.
Let’s leave philosophy to philosophers and concentrate on functionality.
Can you describe the problems that will be hard to overcome within the current blockchain Scope?
There are several problems that are already hard to overcome.
It’s so visible that even laymen know it. Ethereum attempts to overeenkomst with it with light client, and Bitcoin with Lightning Network. Both their solutions (and many others) are just workarounds. They may work te short-term. Ter long – lack of the capability of the blockchain to be scaled is inherent. It’s a one dimensional structure where beginning depends on end and vice versa. There is no good solution to split it. With multidimensional (Three+Two) scheme of Bitlattice there are actually several strategies that enable scaling. Both atomic and more general. And it’s inherent. So, ter ordinary words, an inherent feature of blockchain is it’s un-scalability, inherent feature of Bitlattice is scalability. Bitlattice’s clusters can operate independently while still retaining integrity. Thus there is no need of utter knots (or slew of them) when certain network saturation is achieved. Because most of informatie isn’t stored ter blocks – it’s stored te the subtle structure of lattice. Ter homomorphic transformations leading to certain opstelling of lattice (using a rather popular science analogy – it’s like the gegevens storage te a hologram. Not precies, but gives an idea). All te Trio+Two dimensions (because it gives enough capacity for the system itself to live till the end of universe without risk of being overflown, while still being effortless to calculate). So, this system is planned to be scalable from the very beginning. Also, what is actually unlikely with a blockchain solution, lattice enables mededinger operations (spil long spil they don’t cross the boundary of two or more clusters that are subject to some operations).
One of the thickest problems with blockchain is time (events) synchronization. Thus you have PoW/PoS and multitude of other proofs. PoS attempts to mitigate time issues with te fact dirty hacking and stacking. Lattice solution offers different treatment – every cluster of lattice can have own time, spil long spil there is no operation crossing lattice clusters’ boundary there is no need to synchronize. Even when synchronization vereiste occur switches are communicated by a subtle structure of lattice itself. Like switches te fractal dimensions due to subtle switches of parameters. I’m poor teacher and hardly find good comparisons, but this is closest to actual idea.
What is the point of network saturation that you need to achieve to make total knots unnecessary?
It needs to be calculated. But harshly – it requires few days of operation and enough saturation is achieved. It’s not about big numbers, it’s just about at least some transactions. To have a structure evolved beyond few recorded operations only.
Can you explain a mededinger operation that would cross the boundary of two or more clusters that are subject to some operation?
Te the present scheme of blockchain there is no possibility to perform more than two operations at once, stemming from the fact that every next blocks depends on the previous. Of course this is mitigated by packing numerous transactions into one block and pushing them collectively. But it’s far from concurrency, rather it’s just a way to overeenkomst with this very limited structure. Ter lattice things are different. There can be numerous root points that are referred to from the main root. It resembles child chains ter some applications, but is very different on the basic level of functionality.
With lattice, many operations can be performed at the same ogenblik te time by different miners/processing units. And still the entire structure will retain integrity. Because clusters can, but usually won’t overlap.
Can you give mij an example of an application that, if performed on a lattice would outperform blockchain at scale?
Actually every operation would be swifter and will scale. Because there is no need to consultatie contents of entire chain every time operations are performed.
Which applications for Bitcoin/Ethereum/Others are running into urgent/critical scaling issues?
With time – all of them. There is a never ending story with permanently growing time of BTC operations. After another hack te Ethereum there were considerable problems with even completing transactions.
And this happens te all chains that build up considerable size. While te most cases time to perform hashing grows leisurely with a longer chain’s length, it still requires more and more power. Even with lightclient (or Lightning Network) there is still need for many total knots. And there is no way to circumvent it.
Spil to real life – check times of txs te most popular chains – hmmm.
Bitlattice is best suited for lattice-based encryption. And not because of name – actually lattice has two meanings, and my vormgeving encompasses both. It wasgoed proven that such systems aren’t breakable with quantum computers (no way to pauze an algorithm into mededinger set of operations that QC slurps for breakfast). But this isn’t the most significant feature. The most significant is the possibility to make fully homomorphic encryption that leads to entities living ter lattice and having their own private/public keys that enable them to independently sign anything. Spil you know, contracts vereiste still be run by people and cannot use any keys on their own (because such keys could be read from chain). With homomorphic encryption, it becomes possible to have encrypted entities with built ter key-pairs interacting with the outside world independently (It has nothing to do with child blockchain).
Spil to fully homomorphic encryption – it’s something very novel and experimental. But indeed cool!
Internet of Things (IoT) and mobile devices presently have problems with chain applications because such applications require lots of resources. Even light clients won’t solve the punt, spil they still need some chain synchronization and often it is still a lotsbestemming of gegevens exchanged. Even if the data-transferring wasn’t an punt, the synchronization leaves slagroom for attack vectors due to their dependence on outer utter knots. BitLattice will require only having skill of the local cluster (with size not being hard set – every size will getraind. It will be ter discretion of the device to ease work by extending the cluster if performing border-crossing operations turns out to be more expensive). More, even crossing border will be far less costly than comparable chain operations spil the only proof required would be proof of subtle structure. Which can be performed with GPU cores spil it’s based on parametric kinks.
Can you list some example advantages of lattices spil they apply to IoT?
IoT devices are meant to be petite and power saving. Thus they cannot provide high processing power. They also cannot serve big storage for gegevens. Blockchain based solutions cannot be fully applied without total knot. Bitcoin chain weights now many GBs. The same applies to all popular chains. While memories are cheaper every year, they stopped following Moore’s law. So, very likely chains will grow swifter than actual gegevens capabilities. Managing storage also requires energy, spil well spil processing gegevens. So, for IoT there are workarounds like light clients and web apis. While they solve some issues they open fresh attack vectors.
Lattice needs no workarounds. Only client defined cluster has to be fetched, with boundaries adjusted to most used transaction vectors. Thus it requires very little memory and energy.
Whose attempting to solve similar problems?
The entire blockchain industry. Bitcoin with patchy lighting network. Ethereum with patchy light clients. Actually all overeenkomst with thesis problems, via light clients, via sidechains, but none deals by providing better scheme.
If the code is open sourced, what will zekering big players from taking your solution and sharing it with their community. What is proprietary?
Open source does not mean that there is no license. There can be.
It means just this – the source is open. Bitcoin is open sourced spil well. But actual skill te this area is so scarce that no one can steal it. The same applies to Bitlattice – if wij work out this scheme we’ll have most latest and best skill what is under the bondage mask. It’s so elementary. And it works well te blockchain world since the beginning.
What about this project is lasting? What gives it longevity?
Gegevens Mining, Unique Applications, Communal Developments.
Sustainability against other lattice solutions that come to market…
Plasticity gives it longevity. Blockchain isn’t pliable. It’s very limiting. Wij provide a structure that can be extended and hacked without harm. And this stems from this structure’s inherent features.
So if very first to market and leadership are the plays, it will have to be the community development along with successful dapps that will give Bitlattice sustainability spil a revenue generating project.
Right. Wij benefit from being very first. Like Bitcoin. And of course at a stage inbetween development finish and deployment it vereiste become community driven project. But not earlier. Spil to dapps – we’ll give devices only (like Bitcoin) the surplus can be made by community members. And will. If our product will provide handy and convenient contraptions people will use it.
So there is an educational curve for a developer to use the Bitlattice? What would be the best pre-requisites? Dev’s presently te blockchain communities?
Sure, spil usual. But spil most of operations will be similar or identical to chain ones there will be no steep learning curve. Also, the api can be structured to be similar to those on the market.
Yes, current devs dealing with blockchain. Because who else? Web designers? 🙂
Spil to special math abilities – for the end users (and end devs) there is no need for them to know what is under the rubber hood. The same with Bitlattice. Those who will need to know details will read the whitepaper and associated docs. All math will be there. The surplus will have dev docs aimed at providing convenient interface.
What will a developer have to do differently te order to develop on Bitlattice?
Ideally – nothing. The basic set of operations won’t switch. So, transactions, contracts, etc. There will be extra features that they can learn if they want (said autonomous entities). But the base remains unchanged.
Who is your very first market?
Developer community presently involved te blockchain projects and are reaching urgency te regards to solving for the above mentioned problems.
Plus speculators, traders and all interested te fresh currencies. Given speed of transactions and different timing schemes, this coin can build up reasonable attention due to its plasticity.
Spil a side note – I’m trader too. One thing I perceive spil an punt ter the crypto world is length of lags (confirmations) te main coins. This prohibits swift shifts inbetween coins. Fiat money markets often operate on miliseconds intervals (I have history of being broker on forex years ago and still interested te thesis issues). Cryptocoins seldom stick to minutes. Especially when there is a need to shift funds inbetween exchanges. That’s why I thought about multiwallet DApp with exchange built ter.
Target initial audience depends on what set of native applications will be developed very first. Spil quick operations are an inherent feature applications like swift payments and micropayments can also be a very first market.
When you say “attempt to supplement existing blockchain based technologies with more lithe scheme ” Do you mean that Bitlattice netwerken will work together with existing blockchains?
Nope. Actually it will substitute them, but just not to be negative I attempted to use milder wording. But this should be stated otherwise, I agree. Spil to possible integration – there are possible ports of blockchains into lattice, but not the other way round, spil lattice is more sophisticated and cannot be packed into less complicated scheme.
Any Unique Features that emerge from the lattice scheme?
There are also features not yet mentioned here. Homomorphic encryption and indeed autonomous entities are mentioned above. More, there are some inherent features roped with math used that enable even quicker processing due to leveraging GPUs simplified calculations (te particular matrixes). Also stream balancing that with this scheme is effortless to apply.
One significant feature stems from the fact that knots ter lattice aren’t required to have motionless size. This enables far more lithe gegevens management and permits more sophisticated operations on this gegevens than those possible ter classic blockchain. Of course, no immobile size does not mean no limit. Otherwise this network could be subject to quick overflow. Thus, there will be limit, however not immovable one. Price for extra gegevens will grow exponentially and will tend to infinity around certain set value that can (but doesn’t have to) switch under certain circumstances. Actual implementation is a matter of evaluation.
And many minor ones that can turn up straks to be key ones. But very first the structure voorwaarde be fully evaluated. It’s demonstrable it will work spil expected, the question is what other benefits can be also squeezed from it.